💪💪💪 We’re on a mission to help one million people RISE by 2030 💪💪💪
📚📚📚 Reading Time: 2 minutes 📚📚📚
👂👂👂 Listen on podcast via www.myrise.co.uk/podcast 👂👂👂
💡💡💡
If you’re a frustrated yo-yo dieter and gym disliker who would like to lose 20lbs in 8 weeks while developing lasting healthy habits without having to do boring exercise you hate and give up food you love, then email contact@myrise.co.uk with ‘RISE’ and we’ll send you the information for our online 20lbs weight loss challenges.
💡💡💡
Have you ever gained weight?
If so, how much in lbs?
Eg: 30lbs
And over how many days?
Eg: 300 days
Times the weight in lbs by 3.5.
Eg: 105
Then put three zero’s on the end.
Eg: 105,000
Divide that by the number of days.
Eg: 350
That number is the daily number of surplus calories that you would have had over maintenance, on average, for that to happen.
We’re aware there are variances in the accuracy of that, but it won’t be too far from the truth.
If you’ve gained 3 stone (42lbs) over 10 years it would be 141 and so on.
Let’s say your maintenance calories (the amount you would maintain current weight on) are 2,000 (smaller less active person) to 3,500 (larger, more active person).
————- I know some people will feel their maintenance calories are much lower than this, but until that can be proved under test conditions (and it hasn’t after many thousands of attempts), I’m happy to go with these numbers ————
Again, it won’t be a million miles out of that range if it is.
What percentage is the surplus of maintenance?
Eg: 350 / 2,000 * 100 = 17.5%
141 / 3,000 * 100 = 4.7%
For most people that surplus will be somewhere between 5 and 20%.
Maybe 30% at most.
Meaning, in essence, that if that person had eaten 5 to 20% less in that time frame, they would have maintained.
Or if we were to go 5 to 20% under maintenance, we would lose that weight over the same amount of time.
It’s often not as big a change needed as we’ve been telling ourselves it is.
Not saying it’s easy, but probably more doable than we thought?
And it might not be that we even need to eat less.
Could we eat the same volume at a 5 to 20% lower calorie density?
Or even more at half the average density?
Again, there’s only so much accuracy in all these numbers.
But the concept is valid.
And the numbers won’t be too far from reality.
But, the key is that the changes we would benefit from making often aren’t as big as we’ve been telling ourselves they are…………
Much love,
Jon ‘Carol Vorderman’ Hall